Spring came early to Zurich last week, but the beautiful weather was not matched by the messages from financial experts at a special EEB “hearing”. We went to find out how energy fits in to the calculations of some of the world’s leading financiers. But the message was not terribly encouraging.
We held in-depth discussions with people investing in or managing buildings representing ABN AMBRO, Allianz, COFRA, Green Building Finance Consortium, SwissRe, UBS, Zürcher KantonalBank, and Zouk Venture. Academia was represented by professors from Karlsruhe and Stuttgart Universities
Direct and indirect investment in property gives good returns. It is an effective hedge against inflation and a useful alternative to equities. Most asset managers recommend a significant real estate element in investment portfolios. So we had plenty of questions about the energy aspects:
- Are investors interested in the energy efficiency of buildings? Not much. Direct investors look at the total cost of running a building, and energy costs typically amount to only 5 % or so. There is more interest by companies owning and using a building (rather than leasing it to gain financial returns) because of the longer timescale. But even then, energy is not very significant in the investment decision.
- Are rising energy costs changing attitudes? Not yet – the price elasticity is low and energy costs are small compared to other operating costs.
- The relationships between investors, owners and occupiers is important. In many countries owners cannot pass investment costs on to the tenants. So they can’t recover investments to improve energy efficiency. On the other hand, such investments could pay off if the value of the property rises.

Recent Comments